The Epstein Files Transparency Act was signed into law requiring the DOJ to release all unclassified records related to Epstein and Maxwell within 30 days. The DOJ identified a total of six million pages of evidence. As of February 2026, only 3.5 million pages have been released, leaving approximately 2.5 million pages unreleased. The law itself was a direct result of years of survivor advocacy and public pressure following Epstein's 2019 death.

The Department of Justice released 3.5 million pages organized into 12 data sets. Almost immediately, a critical problem was identified: Data Set 10, containing 180,000 images and 2,000 videos, features heavy redactions described by the DOJ as protecting potential victims. However, critics and legal observers noted that some victims remain identifiable in the files while potential perpetrators are shielded. This means the system that protected powerful people during Epstein's life appears to be continuing in how the documents are being redacted — protecting predators while exposing victims.

The Justice Department shared a diagram mapping Epstein's inner circle as part of the document release. A number of names and faces in the diagram are redacted. The confirmed named figures in the inner circle include: Ghislaine Maxwell (convicted co-conspirator), Jean-Luc Brunel (French modeling agent, died by suicide in French prison 2022 before trial), Darren Indyke (personal lawyer, named in will for $50M), Richard Kahn (accountant, named in will for $25M), Harry Beller (financial adviser), and Lesley Groff (personal assistant, prosecutors had prepared to indict in 2007). The number of redacted figures in the diagram has not been publicly disclosed.

One of the most serious failures in the DOJ's handling of the release is a pattern that inverts the purpose of the Epstein Files Transparency Act: victim names are being exposed while the men who abused them remain hidden behind redactions. Attorney Brad Edwards, who represents hundreds of Epstein survivors, described it as "literally thousands of mistakes." One victim who chose to remain anonymous as "Jane Doe" found her name appearing in multiple places in the files — including in email exchanges she had personally with Epstein. Her lawyer Jennifer Plotkin told CNN she had previously reached out to DOJ asking them to correct the exposure in earlier file batches and never heard back. A joint statement from a group of survivors and family members of Virginia Giuffre stated: "This latest release of Jeffrey Epstein files is being sold as transparency, but what it actually does is expose survivors. Once again, survivors are having their names and identifying information exposed, while the men who abused us remain hidden and protected. That is outrageous." Skye Roberts, brother of the late Virginia Giuffre, added that the DOJ is "redacting the names of perpetrators and unredacting the names of victims — quite the opposite of what the Epstein Files Transparency Act was meant to do." The DOJ also temporarily posted unredacted nude images of victims before removing them, according to reporting first published by The New York Times. Deputy AG Todd Blanche acknowledged at a press conference that "mistakes are inevitable" while claiming the DOJ "takes victim protection very seriously." Rep. Ro Khanna stated the DOJ is "purposefully muddying the waters on who was a predator and who was mentioned in an email." This website does not name any victims. Any victims named in DOJ documents are referred to here only as Victim / Jane Doe in accordance with their right to privacy.

Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche sent a six-page letter to top members of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees listing hundreds of "politically exposed persons" who appear in the released files. The DOJ was compelled to produce the list under the Epstein Files Transparency Act. The letter states: "Names appear in the files released under the Act in a wide variety of contexts — some individuals had extensive direct email contact with Epstein or Maxwell while other individuals are mentioned only in a portion of a document that on its face is unrelated to the Epstein and Maxwell matters." The list includes presidents, business leaders, government officials, and cultural figures including Princess Diana, Elvis Presley, and Michael Jackson — people mentioned in passing who had no known connection to Epstein's crimes. Rep. Ro Khanna, co-author of the law, said the DOJ is "purposefully muddying the waters on who was a predator and who was mentioned in an email." Rep. Nancy Mace claimed there are "missing names on the list." No one on the list other than Epstein and Maxwell has ever been charged.

Deputy Attorney General Blanche stated on February 2, 2026 that there would be no additional prosecutions related to Epstein. He said the files contained "a lot of correspondence, a lot of emails, a lot of photographs" but that the materials did not "allow us necessarily to prosecute somebody." This came despite a draft indictment released by the DOJ — never brought to trial — which would have charged Epstein alongside three unnamed defendants who allegedly conspired to "procure females under the age of 18" to engage "in lewd conduct for money to satisfy Jeffrey Epstein's prurient interests." The identities of the three unnamed co-defendants remain publicly unknown. Instead of bringing the charges, federal prosecutors in 2007 reached the non-prosecution agreement with Epstein. Reps. Khanna and Massie indicated they would consider contempt or impeachment proceedings if DOJ compliance did not improve.

As of early March 2026, the DOJ's Epstein file collection is more than 65,000 pages shorter than what the agency initially released. The DOJ has been quietly removing documents from the public release without full public explanation. This raises serious concerns about the completeness and integrity of the record. Jmail, an independent archive that has been tracking the release, has archived 1,412,250 files and 2,474,242 pages as of February 19, 2026.

⚠ Important: All news sources are secondary. Always cross-reference with primary DOJ documents at justice.gov/epstein.

Government & Primary:
DOJ Epstein Library · DOJ Disclosures — All 12 Sets · House Oversight Committee Release

Browsable Archive:
Jmail — Independent Archive (1.4M+ files indexed)

Major Coverage:
CBS News — Full Coverage & Live Updates
CBS News — Notable Names: Gates, Musk, Prince Andrew
CBS News — Epstein Files Project (Ongoing)
CNN — What's Inside the Latest Release
CNN — Breaking Down the Boldface Names
CNN — DOJ List of 300+ Named Individuals
CNN — DOJ Unredacts Names Under Congressional Pressure
CNN — Live Coverage Jan 30, 2026
PBS NewsHour — List of Powerful Men Named
PBS NewsHour — Latest Release Details
NBC News — Key Takeaways
NBC Los Angeles — Power People Named in Files
NewsNation — Prominent Figures Named
Wikipedia — Epstein Files (Continuously Updated)

Fifty crime scene photographs taken by the FBI on July 6, 2019 during the search and arrest execution at Jeffrey Epstein's Manhattan mansion at 9 East 71st Street, New York, NY. FBI Case ID 31E-NY-3027571. The photographs document: the exterior entrance and front door of the Upper East Side townhouse (a multi-story limestone building with gold "JE" initials mounted at the entryway); forcible entry damage — the front wooden door was breached, with extensive splintering around the lock and handle assembly; an interior foyer featuring large Japanese-style ink wash paintings (mountain landscape scrolls) flanking a grand interior door with Chinese-inspired brass hardware; a security operations room on the ground floor containing multiple stacked large-screen monitors (approximately 8–12 monitors on adjustable mounts), two computer workstations, and what appears to be a server rack cabinet containing networking equipment, hard drives, and computing hardware; a framed document in a red border, text unreadable; artwork on the walls including a painting of a woman in a blue dress, and a painting or photograph of a figure posed in a chair; a maintenance/HVAC room in the building; a storage closet containing power tools (drill, spray paint cans), boxes, and a pull-down ceiling access panel with wiring visible; a small workroom with a document shredder (GBC brand), filing cabinet, paper shredder rolls, binders and documents on shelving units; a bathroom and shower area; a mail organization wall-mount unit labeled "MAIL" with slots for what appear to be outgoing items labeled GSJ, LSJ, ZORRO, PB, and PARIS; a closet with organized mesh-drawer storage units labeled with categories including "Large Envelopes," "Small Envelopes," "JE Stationary," "Apple," "Electronics and Adapters," "Labels Made," "Pens Pencils Markers," and "Misc Office Supply" — also visible: multiple copies of Barron's TOEFL iBT prep books (2 copies), and three copies of "Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House" by Michael Wolff; a main office with a circular room featuring wood-paneled walls, black floor, Apple iMac desktop computer, red lacquer desk with chrome frame, books, coffee table art books, and a decorative guitar; bookshelves full of books; framed black-and-white celebrity photographs on the walls; a basement/sub-level storage area containing multiple flat-file map cabinets on wheels labeled "ZORRO," "MISC," "E. ROLLA," and "71st"; and a main residence corridor with marble tile floors, ornate gilded moldings, and a view into a formal hallway. Additional photographs document an elegant powder room with granite countertop on brass legs, a large ornate gold-framed mirror, black sculptural bust decorative pieces, and wall-mounted artwork prints; a velvet upholstered settee bench in a hallway; and multiple framed architectural interior sketches displayed throughout the residence corridors. The EFTA numbering system (Epstein Files Transparency Act) indicates this is among the earliest-sequenced evidence items in the DOJ release.

Fifty additional crime scene photographs (Set 1, continuation) taken by the FBI on July 6, 2019 during the search and arrest at Jeffrey Epstein's Manhattan mansion at 9 East 71st Street, New York, NY. FBI Case ID 31E-NY-3027571. These photographs document the interior of the main residence across multiple floors and stairwells, continuing from EFTA00000001–00000050. The photographs document: an interior hallway with brass elevator doors, marble tile floors inlaid with dark diamond accents, and gilded crown molding (EFTA00000051); the grand foyer receiving area with an ornate gilded Baroque-style console table bearing an FBI evidence marker "D," a decorative framed photograph with a redacted face, ceramic animal figurines, a marble fireplace surround, and a view down the main corridor (EFTA00000052); the grand main staircase from two angles — polished mahogany treads, elaborate wrought-iron balustrade with rose and scroll motifs, brass accents, abstract white face sculptures on a console, a chess set on a gilt pedestal table, white armchair seating, and an elaborate sky and clouds mural on the ceiling with gold-leaf trim (EFTA00000053–00000054); a reception room featuring a marble fireplace with gilded acanthus-leaf mantel surround, two ornate gilded Chippendale mirrors, a framed painting of an unsettling green-tinted portrait of a figure (facing left) above the mantel, white armchairs, and chess pieces on a gilt table (EFTA00000055–00000056); a ceiling detail of the main stair hall showing a large painted sky-and-clouds canvas ceiling in a gold-trimmed frame with a suspended carved angel or religious figure on a rope descending from the painting (EFTA00000057); a hallway door with FBI evidence marker "E" and a glimpsed room featuring a large zebra-and-animal composite painting in black, orange, and gold tones (EFTA00000058); a powder room with a marble countertop sink, brass fixtures, black decorative figurine sculptures, patterned wallpaper, and a view toward the zebra artwork (EFTA00000059); a corridor off the powder room with a bronze life-size statue of a seated smiling boy in a cap on a bench, large framed entomology specimen boxes displaying insects on dark backgrounds, and the zebra painting (EFTA00000060); the powder room toilet compartment showing a large black gorilla-face wall sculpture, a vertical dark framed artwork panel depicting a white bird/swan figure on a black ground, and patterned wallpaper (EFTA00000061); a hallway corner with an ornate floor clock — dark blue marble and brass pedestal topped by a gilt mantel clock with a sculptural bronze nude male figure (EFTA00000062); a corridor hallway view with the bronze boy statue, dark art panels, and a view through to the main white marble corridor with chandelier (EFTA00000063); a bedroom doorway with FBI evidence marker "F" — interior visible: made bed with floral coverlet, vanity dressing table with gilt mirror, a gold disc decorative piece, framed black-and-white photograph, and two leopard-print armchairs (EFTA00000064); a private dining or meeting room from two angles — a large rectangular table draped in a floral-pattern tablecloth surrounded by leopard-print tub chairs, white-painted paneled walls with an intricate monochromatic Asian landscape mural (mountains, clouds, trees), a dark portrait painting of a bearded elderly man in a gold frame, a black fireplace mantel with a clock, a bouquet of white flowers as centerpiece, an easel with canvas artwork, and personal items on the table including papers, a black object, and a vase (EFTA00000065–00000068); a second angle of this room revealing a large decorative Chinese gong on a wooden stand, a whiteboard on an easel visible at the edge of the frame, a framed sideboard displaying multiple personal photographs (faces not readable at this resolution), and a bronze figurine bust on a pedestal at the table's head (EFTA00000066–00000067); a view toward large windows with floor-length cream curtains, the sideboard's photo display more visible — approximately 8–10 framed photographs of various sizes, subjects unidentifiable (EFTA00000068); a butler's pantry or service passage with rich mahogany cabinetry, a porthole-style round window in the door, and a view into an adjacent bathroom with granite countertop and bar stools (EFTA00000069); a porthole door close-up with FBI evidence marker "G" — visible through the door: a bathroom or kitchen-adjacent area with chrome-finish bar stools and a countertop (EFTA00000070); a service kitchen corridor with white cabinetry, dark granite countertops, a silver tea service tray, a water cooler dispenser, and a view down to the main kitchen (EFTA00000071); the main kitchen from two angles — a semi-circular breakfast counter with high white bar stools, dark granite countertops, a professional-grade gas range with industrial stainless hood, an ornate decorative ceramic plate with royal heraldic motif (crown and fleur-de-lis pattern in blue and gold) mounted on the wall, a Gothic-style hanging iron lantern, a wall clock, and kitchen appliances including a microwave and coffee maker (EFTA00000072–00000073); a cooking area close-up with a commercial-grade gas range/flat-top griddle combination with heavy use-marks and soot, a water cooler dispenser, and white overhead cabinetry (EFTA00000074); a service corridor with multiple white paneled doors, dark hardwood floors, and flush-mount globe lighting (EFTA00000075); a building stairwell showing exposed red fire suppression pipework, a fire hose cabinet, and utility stairs with gray carpeting (EFTA00000076); an interior service elevator with stainless steel accordion scissor-gate, a white plastic chair and box fan stored inside (EFTA00000077); a counter ledge with two silver candle holders and two silver-framed photographs — one showing two men standing together (one partially visible, faces at low resolution), one showing a redacted subject (EFTA00000078); a utility or laundry room door with FBI evidence marker "H" — interior dark, white cabinetry visible (EFTA00000079); a utility/storage room interior with white cabinetry, counter with a printer, brown paper shopping bags (Bergdorf Goodman logo visible), and a wall-mounted AED defibrillator instruction poster (EFTA00000080); an HVAC/electrical service passage with visible panel board, connecting to the utility storage room (EFTA00000081); a cedar-lined coat closet with FBI evidence marker "I" on the door — interior reveals two clothing rods full of hanging outerwear (EFTA00000082–00000087): the closet contains coats and jackets of both men's and women's styles including multiple Canada Goose parkas (red, white, navy, and tan with fur-trimmed hoods), a distinctive olive/tan suede long coat, winter boots (snow boots, rubber Wellington boots, hiking boots, blue polka-dot flat shoes), garment bags, and a clothing brush on a small shelf; the main staircase viewed from the foyer base looking upward, showing the ornate balustrade continuing to the second floor, a view of the white plaster face sculptures on the console table, and on the first landing: an ornate antique chair with green upholstery and carved dark-wood frame (EFTA00000088–00000090); the service/fire stairwell at ground floor level showing: a "GROUND FLOOR" sign, three fire extinguishers (all bearing 2018 inspection tags and phone number 718-423-1900 from a service company), red overhead sprinkler pipes, and a fire valve assembly in a recessed cabinet (EFTA00000091–00000093); and the service stairwell walls displaying artwork: a color-print photograph of a carnival or festival performer in an elaborate jeweled and feathered costume, several small black-and-white framed photographs (a pier/dock scene with vertical pilings; abstract architectural image), and a view of the gray-carpeted stair risers (EFTA00000094–00000100).

EFTA00000015–EFTA00000020 document a dedicated security operations room at 9 East 71st Street. The room contains at minimum two workstation desks with 8–12 large flat-screen monitors (ViewSonic and other brands) mounted on adjustable multi-arm mounts — consistent with a professional CCTV monitoring or trading-floor style setup. A server rack cabinet (open at the time of FBI photography) contains networking switches, hard drives, and what appears to be recording or computing hardware. The setup is consistent with a property-wide video surveillance system. Multiple investigators and journalists have previously documented that Epstein's properties were equipped with cameras. This photographic evidence confirms the infrastructure existed at 9 East 71st Street as of his July 2019 arrest. A framed document on the wall of an adjacent hallway, a service record sheet for water treatment of a cooling tower, lists the client as "Merwin Dela Cruz – J.Epstein" with multiple service jobs from April 2018 through December 2018 (job codes 5135, 5136, 4849, 5137), documenting routine maintenance of the building's mechanical systems.

EFTA00000026–EFTA00000028 show a wall-mounted mail/document organizer with labeled slots: GSJ, LSJ, ZORRO, PB, and PARIS. These abbreviated labels appear to represent either people or properties. "PARIS" may refer to Epstein's Paris property (a townhouse on Avenue Foch). "ZORRO" is a documented codename — Epstein's New Mexico ranch was officially named Zorro Ranch. "PB" likely refers to Palm Beach. "GSJ" and "LSJ" are currently unidentified initials — as new names from the DOJ release are confirmed, these will be updated. Nearby in the same storage room: a Rimowa aluminum suitcase with a yellow sticky note, boxes, and green rock-crystal decorative objects on open shelving. These labels are significant as they confirm the organizational system used at Epstein's Manhattan base connected to his other known properties and contacts.

EFTA00000036–EFTA00000037 document a closet off the main office area containing a set of three organized mesh-drawer storage towers. On top of the unit: three (3) copies of "Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House" by Michael Wolff (2018), and two (2) copies of Barron's TOEFL iBT prep books (standard English-language testing prep used by non-native English speakers). Also visible: a set of Prismacolor art supplies and what appears to be a "48 Colors" art set. The presence of multiple copies of a single political book, alongside English-language testing materials, is noted without further characterization at this time. As the DOJ release is reviewed further, any additional context will be added.

FBI document dated July 24, 2006, Case ID 31E-MM-108062, confirms the FBI Miami office formally opened the Epstein investigation classified as WSTA — Child Prostitution. The Palm Beach County Police Department investigation had run from March 15, 2005 through February 2006. The FBI case opening document shows routine precedence — meaning despite involving a billionaire and multiple minors, it was not treated as a priority matter. All agent names are redacted under b6 and b7C exemptions. Source: FBI Vault Part 01, Civil Action #17-cv-03956, document 03956-17.

Palm Beach Police Department Probable Cause Affidavit, Case #05-368, sworn May 1, 2006 before Palm Beach County, State of Florida. Defendant: Jeffrey Epstein, White Male. Confirms a sexual battery investigation ran from March 15, 2005 through February 2006. One confirmed unredacted witness: Alfredo Rodriguez, former Epstein houseman employed November 2004 through May 2005, whose responsibilities included butler, chauffeur, chef, and running errands for Epstein and his guests. Rodriguez gave a sworn taped statement January 4, 2006. Source: FBI Vault Part 01, document 03956-19.

Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County Florida. Order Sealing Affidavit and Application for Search Warrant, signed October 19, 2005 by Circuit Court Judge Laura Johnson. Orders the search warrant affidavit and all related documents sealed "until further order of the Court." Within approximately one month of the investigation beginning, evidence was already being sealed from public view. This sealing order is why so many of the original 2005 police documents were never made public during the investigation. Source: FBI Vault Part 01, document 03956-235.

FBI document dated August 1, 2006, Case ID 31E-MM-108062, requests opening of two sub-files: SUB-SBP to capture subpoena requests, and SUB-FF to capture forfeiture related materials. This confirms the FBI was investigating Epstein's assets and considering seizing property as early as August 2006 — two years before the non-prosecution agreement was signed. Source: FBI Vault Part 01, document 03956-69.

FBI document dated September 14, 2006, Title: "Case update. Delayed Investigation." Confirms the Epstein investigation was delayed because the lead investigating agent was reassigned to a kidnapping investigation since January 17, 2006. The Epstein investigation had no dedicated lead agent for approximately 8 months during the period when the case should have been building toward federal charges. Source: FBI Vault Part 01, document 03956-99.

FBI document dated September 13, 2006, Miami to Miami-FIG (Financial Intelligence Group), Case 31E-MM-108062. The Details section states "An ongoing federal investigation has revealed that" — then is fully redacted under b3, b6, and b7C exemptions. The involvement of the Financial Intelligence Group confirms the FBI was following Epstein's money by September 2006. What they found remains redacted. Source: FBI Vault Part 01, document 03956-96.

FBI document dated September 18, 2006, Miami to New York Crimes Against Children Squad C-20, Case 31E-MM-108062. Confirms the FBI opened an investigation involving "multi-millionaire Jeffrey Epstein and captioned subjects." A Grand Jury subpoena was enclosed for service. By September 2006 the FBI had formally involved its specialized Crimes Against Children unit in New York — indicating the case had grown beyond what the Miami field office could handle alone. Source: FBI Vault Part 01, document 03956-101.

Official US District Court Grand Jury Subpoena, Southern District of Florida, FGJ 05-02(WPB)-Fri./No. OLY-19, dated October 6, 2006. Location: US District Courthouse, 701 Clematis Street, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401, Room 4-A. The recipient and documents subpoenaed are fully redacted. This confirms federal grand jury proceedings were formally underway by October 2006 — more than a year before the non-prosecution agreement was signed. Source: FBI Vault Part 01, document 03956-111.

FBI document October 17, 2006, New York to Miami. Confirms the Grand Jury subpoena was served on October 16, 2006. New York then stated: "At this time, no further action will be taken by the New York Office in this matter. Lead is covered." New York's specialized Crimes Against Children unit, after being formally brought in, closed its involvement after serving a single subpoena — leaving the entire federal investigation back in Miami's hands. Source: FBI Vault Part 01, document 03956-110.

Palm Beach Post reporting from police sources inserted into FBI file: When Palm Beach police searched Epstein's mansion, they found a clock on his desk with a camera hidden inside, a high school transcript belonging to a girl, and a massage table in his bedroom. Police said the camera's position suggested it could film people sitting across the desk from Epstein. Source: Palm Beach Post, July–August 2006 clippings, FBI Vault Part 01.

Palm Beach Post reporting from police sources: Haley Robson, then 18, gave a sworn statement at police headquarters admitting she took at least six girls to visit Epstein, all between the ages of 14 and 16. Epstein paid her $200 for each visit. Robson told detectives "I'm like a Heidi Fleiss." Source: Palm Beach Post, July 26, 2006, included in FBI Vault Part 01 as newspaper clipping, document 03956-66.

Palm Beach Post reporting: Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz, hired by Epstein, traveled to West Palm Beach with information obtained from victims' MySpace profiles about their discussions of alcohol and marijuana use. He took this research to prosecutors in early 2006 to cast doubt on the teenagers' reliability. Source: Palm Beach Post, July 29, 2006, included in FBI Vault Part 01 as newspaper clipping, document 03956-67.

Palm Beach Post reporting from police sources: Palm Beach police received complaints that private eyes hired by Epstein's legal team were posing as police officers when interviewing witnesses. Detectives also received complaints that two of the victims or their families had been harassed or threatened. One woman was told she would be compensated if she didn't cooperate with police. Phone records confirmed the call was then routed through Epstein's personal assistant to a New York corporation affiliated with Epstein. Source: Palm Beach Post, August 14, 2006, included in FBI Vault Part 01 as newspaper clipping, document 03956-84.

The FBI Vault Part 01 release begins with a Deleted Page Information Sheet confirming 258 pages were removed before public release under FOIA/PA Civil Action #17-cv-03956. Deletion exemptions include b3, b6, b7A, b7C, b7D, b7E, and b7E-4. Pages 250 through 317 are listed as "OTHER — Court Sealing Order" — a judge specifically ordered those 68 pages sealed, separate from and additional to the standard FOIA deletions. Source: FBI Vault Part 01, Deleted Page Information Sheet, pages 1–6 of the release.

FBI Vault Part 02 Deleted Page Information Sheet, Civil Action #17-cv-03956, documents two separate deletions. The main file had 46 pages removed under b3, b6, and b7C. But a second, far larger deletion comes from the witness sub-file: 456 consecutive pages deleted — every single one under b6 (personal privacy), b7C (law enforcement record privacy), and b7D (confidential source identity). The b7D exemption is the one used specifically to protect witnesses and informants. Unlike Part 01 — where deletions were scattered across specific pages with varying exemption codes — Part 02's witness sub-file was removed as a single, uniform block. This strongly suggests the 456 pages represent the core body of witness interview summaries (FD-302 forms) from survivor and witness interviews conducted by the FBI. They remain entirely hidden. This is the single largest block of deletions confirmed in any Part reviewed to date. Source: FBI Vault Part 02 Deleted Page Information Sheet · Civil Action #17-cv-03956.

FBI document dated December 5, 2006, Miami PBCRA Squad PB-2. Case ID 31E-MM-108062. Title marked "CHANGED" — the investigation had previously been carried as "Jeffrey Epstein; [redacted] WSTA — Child Prostitution." One or more additional named subjects have been added to the case title; their identities are redacted under b3, b6, and b7C exemptions. The synopsis requests assignment of a co-case agent and notes that Palm Beach Police Department Incident Reports and Property Receipts are being submitted to the main case file. The addition of named co-subjects to the formal case title in December 2006 is significant — it indicates the FBI had by this point identified specific individuals beyond Epstein as formal investigative targets. Their names remain redacted. Source: FBI Vault Part 02 · Page 03956-297.

FBI document dated November 13, 2006, Miami PBCRA to New York Squad 20 and Newark RBRA-2. Case ID 31E-MM-108062. Synopsis: to request travel to interview pertinent witnesses. FBI agents and an AUSA (Assistant U.S. Attorney) were to travel from West Palm Beach to New York and New Jersey on December 14, 2006, conduct witness interviews through December 17, 2006, and return December 17. Set Lead 1 directed New York: conduct witness interviews in New York City. Set Lead 2 directed Newark: conduct witness interviews in Redbank, New Jersey. Witness names and interview details are fully redacted under b6 and b7C. The document also notes the case was continuing to develop witnesses and victims from across the United States, with media coverage and the unknown status of the state investigation named as factors. The involvement of an AUSA in witness travel is significant — it suggests prosecutors were conducting or supervising witness preparation, not merely gathering information. Source: FBI Vault Part 02 · Pages 03956-307/308.

FBI document dated December 6, 2006, classified PRIORITY (elevated urgency above routine), from Miami PBCRA Squad PB-2 to: Albuquerque/Santa Fe RA (New Mexico), Jacksonville/Pensacola RA (Florida), and San Juan/St. Thomas RA (U.S. Virgin Islands). Case ID 31E-MM-108062. The document contains an unredacted line of critical significance: "the AUSAs and Case Agents have a target date of January 2007 for indictment." This is a primary source confirmation of the indictment target — written into an active FBI communication nine months before the non-prosecution agreement was ultimately signed. Five action leads were set across the offices: Santa Fe NM was directed to interview a named individual at Epstein's New Mexico property (name redacted b6/b7C); St. Thomas USVI was directed to locate and interview an individual there and to establish Epstein's cellular and residential telephone numbers in the USVI; Pensacola FL received a discretionary interview lead. All witness names and interview subjects are redacted. This document, combined with the 60-count draft indictment prepared by May 2007, establishes that as late as December 2006, federal prosecutors were actively preparing to indict Epstein — and that the decision to instead offer a secret plea deal was made against the momentum of a live, multi-state prosecution. Source: FBI Vault Part 02 · Pages 03956-318–322.

FBI document dated December 20, 2006, Miami to Miami, titled "Creation of i2 Analyst Notebook Charts." Case ID 31E-MM-108062. A b7A exemption is applied — the exemption used for pending law enforcement proceedings that could be harmed by disclosure, indicating this work was directly tied to active prosecution planning. An Intelligence Assistant created 16 i2 Analyst Notebook Charts documenting a target's movements, dates of activity at a specific location, and the day after their departure. The specific target, location, and date ranges are redacted under b6, b7C, and b7E-5. i2 Analyst Notebook is the FBI's standard network analysis tool used to map timelines, movements, and relationships. Creating 16 such charts in December 2006 — one month after agents were dispatched to New York and New Jersey, and the same month that leads were set across six offices — indicates the FBI was assembling visual evidence to present to a grand jury. The b7A exemption confirms the prosecution was still considered active and viable when these records were last reviewed. Source: FBI Vault Part 02 · Page 03956-323.

Three Automated Serial Permanent Charge-Out records (FD-5a forms), dated February 6, 2007, document the transfer of Executive Grand Jury subpoena records to the subpoena sub-file. Serial 63: an Executive FGJ Subpoena issued January 23, 2007, from US District Court (recipient and topic redacted b6-3/b7C-3). Serial 64: an FGJ Subpoena issued January 24, 2007, from the US Attorney (recipient redacted b6-3/b7C-3, topic reads "FGJ Subpoena for [redacted]"). Serial 65: a second Executive FGJ Subpoena issued January 23, 2007, from US District Court (topic reads "Executive FGJ Subpoena for [redacted b6-1/b7C-1]"). All three were transferred to Case ID 31E-MM-108062-SBP, the subpoena sub-file. The recipients and subjects of all three subpoenas are redacted. The simultaneous issuance of executive grand jury subpoenas from both the US District Court and the US Attorney's office in January 2007 is consistent with the PRIORITY document's confirmed indictment target — and directly contradicts any narrative that the investigation was winding down at this time. Source: FBI Vault Part 02 · Pages 03956-344–346.

FBI document dated January 25, 2007, Miami Squad PB-2. Synopsis: to request funds for expenses associated with the captioned case. The document requests two separate "Third Party Draft" payments — a mechanism used for sensitive operational expenses, informant payments, or compensating cooperating witnesses. Both payee names and amounts are fully redacted under b3, b6, and b7C. The document notes: "Prior authorization was obtained from ASAC [redacted]." ASAC (Assistant Special Agent in Charge) is a senior supervisory rank — their required sign-off indicates these were significant or sensitive expenditures that needed higher-level approval. The use of Third Party Draft payments at this stage of the investigation — with witness interviews ongoing and grand jury subpoenas being issued — is consistent with payments to cooperating sources or operational expenses directly related to building the prosecution. Source: FBI Vault Part 02 · Pages 03956-333/334.

FBI document dated February 15, 2007, from Albuquerque Field Office, Squad 13/Santa Fe RA, to Miami PBCRA, Case ID 31E-MM-108062, reference EC-a02157. Title: Jeffrey Epstein; [b3/b6/b7C redacted]; WSTA-Child Prostitution. Synopsis: to report results of covered lead. Enclosures: original and one copy of FD-302 (formal witness interview summary) and the agent's original handwritten notes. Details: a formal interview of a [redacted] individual was conducted at Santa Fe, New Mexico. Results are in the enclosed FD-302. This is a confirmed primary source that the FBI conducted a formal witness interview connected to Epstein's New Mexico property — the Zorro Ranch — in February 2007, just as the case was building toward the January 2007 indictment target. The FD-302 and notes themselves — containing the actual substance of the witness's testimony — are not in the released file. Epstein's Zorro Ranch later became one of the documented locations where survivors described being brought. Source: FBI Vault Part 02 · Page 03956-348.

DOJ Form OBD-211 (Request for Financial Information) dated August 2006, confirming the FBI served a financial records subpoena on a named financial institution — the institution's name and the account holder's identity are redacted under b3, b6, and b7C. The form covers search and processing fees, reproduction costs, and mailing costs — the standard costs financial institutions charge when responding to law enforcement subpoenas for records. This is primary source confirmation that FBI agents were actively subpoenaing financial records from at least one institution in August 2006, consistent with the Financial Intelligence Group involvement documented in Part 01 (document 03956-96, dated September 13, 2006). Together, these documents establish a sustained financial investigation track running alongside the witness and physical evidence work — suggesting the FBI was building a comprehensive case from multiple directions simultaneously before the non-prosecution agreement halted it. Source: FBI Vault Part 02 · Page 03956-355.

FBI Vault Part 03 Deleted Page Information Sheet, Civil Action #17-cv-03956, confirms 434 total deleted pages — every page in this Part. The exemption applied to every single page is b7D-2 (confidential source identity), meaning all 434 pages contain information that would identify witnesses, informants, or cooperating individuals. This is the third consecutive Part of the FBI Vault to contain a large-scale witness testimony deletion: Part 02 had 456 pages deleted from its witness sub-file, and Part 03 has 434 more. The only material released from Part 03 are two entirely blank pages — document numbers 03956-3948 and 03956-3949 — containing no text whatsoever. In terms of public transparency, Part 03 does not exist. Whatever the FBI learned from the witnesses interviewed in this portion of the investigation remains completely hidden. Source: FBI Vault Part 03 Deleted Page Information Sheet · Civil Action #17-cv-03956.

While every page in Part 03 is withheld under b6/b7C/b7D, pages 367 through 375 carry an additional exemption: b7E (law enforcement techniques and procedures). This exemption is used when releasing information would reveal how the FBI conducts investigations — including surveillance methods, undercover techniques, source recruitment strategies, or analytical approaches that could be compromised if disclosed. The appearance of b7E on these nine specific pages within what is otherwise a block of witness testimony suggests the following possibilities: those pages describe how a witness or informant was identified and approached (recruitment methodology); they contain details about surveillance conducted at Epstein's properties; they involve undercover investigative work; or they describe analytical techniques used to corroborate witness accounts. The b7E exemption is not routinely applied — its presence alongside the standard witness protection exemptions signals that these particular pages contain unusually sensitive operational content. Source: FBI Vault Part 03 Deleted Page Information Sheet · pages 367–375 · Civil Action #17-cv-03956.

Among the b7E exemptions applied in Part 03, the sub-variant b7E-8 appears on dozens of specific pages scattered throughout the deletion sheet — including pages 10, 12, 13, 17, 56, 64, 70–72, 92–95, 105, 122, 132–134, 140, 142–144, 218, 254, 285, 327, 330–334, 340, 349, 357, 387, 391–393, 418, 421–422, and 431. The b7E-8 sub-exemption is one of the most specific available — it protects information about particular investigative techniques including undercover operations, electronic surveillance (Title III wiretaps), and source development methodology. Its appearance scattered across what is otherwise a witness testimony file suggests the FBI's investigation of Epstein included electronic surveillance or undercover elements — and that the witnesses or informants in Part 03 provided information that intersects with, or was obtained through, those methods. This is not confirmed by any released document — it is a well-grounded analytical inference from the exemption code pattern. Whether any undercover operation was ever active against Epstein or his network has not been publicly established. Source: FBI Vault Part 03 Deleted Page Information Sheet · b7E-8 pattern · Civil Action #17-cv-03956.

Across Parts 02 and 03 alone, the FBI has withheld at least 890 pages of material under b7D — witness and informant identity protection: Part 02 witness sub-file: 456 pages. Part 03 entire file: 434 pages. Both are withheld under the identical exemption combination (b6/b7C/b7D), strongly suggesting they contain the same category of material — formal FBI witness interview summaries (FD-302 forms) and related documents. The 36 victims identified by FBI in 2006 (documented in Part 01) represent the known starting point. The 890+ pages of hidden testimony likely represent the full scope of what those victims and additional witnesses told federal investigators in detail — the accounts that were, in effect, set aside when Acosta signed the non-prosecution agreement in 2007. These are the voices of the people the system failed to protect. They remain redacted. This analysis is drawn from the exemption patterns across Parts 01–03 and is labeled as analytical inference, not confirmed document content. Source: Cross-analysis of FBI Vault Parts 01–03 Deleted Page Information Sheets · Civil Action #17-cv-03956.

The Part 04 main file Deleted Page Information Sheet (Civil Action #17-cv-03956) confirms 318 total deleted pages. The redaction pattern reveals three distinct categories of content. First, pages 5, 8, 10–18, 46–47, and 85 carry b6/b7C exemptions — personal privacy and law enforcement privacy — indicating individual names and identifiers are protected on these pages. Second, pages 21–43 and 77–79 carry b3+b6+b7C — the addition of b3 (statutory exemption, including grand jury secrecy) signals these pages may involve grand jury material or intelligence-statute-protected content alongside the name redactions. Third, pages 107–360 form the largest block: b6-5/b7C-5 combinations without b7D, meaning they are likely subpoena return documents containing names, phone numbers, and account data — subscriber identity information returned by telecom companies in response to FBI subpoenas. Pages 51–74 are marked as Duplicates — no new redactions, copies of previously processed documents. The total pages carrying confirmed name-level (b6/b7C) redactions in the main file: approximately 38 pages. Source: FBI Vault Part 04 Deleted Page Information Sheet · Civil Action #17-cv-03956.

The second deleted page sheet within Part 04 covers a 200-page witness sub-file, every page of which is withheld under b6-5/b7C-5/b7D-2. The consistent presence of b7D (confidential source and witness identity) across all 200 pages confirms this is a formal witness interview sub-file — the same structure seen in Part 02's 456-page sub-file and the entirety of Part 03. The pattern of sub-filing witness testimony separately from the main investigative record is standard FBI practice and allows the bureau to apply blanket source-protection exemptions to witness accounts. Together, Parts 02, 03, and 04 now account for over 1,090 pages of hidden witness testimony — voices of people who spoke to federal investigators about Epstein's network and whose accounts have never been made public. Source: FBI Vault Part 04 Witness Sub-File Deleted Page Information Sheet · Civil Action #17-cv-03956.

Part 04 contains the actual subpoena returns from multiple telecom companies, revealing the FBI was building a digital footprint case. MySpace.com responded on March 1, 2007 and March 5, 2007 (documents 03956-1604, 03956-1658) with subscriber ID results — the user identities whose accounts were subpoenaed are fully redacted under b3/b6/b7C. Sprint/Nextel Corporate Security responded February 22, 2007 (document 03956-1662) with subpoena return materials — subscriber information fully redacted under b6/b7C. BellSouth Subpoena Compliance responded February 27–28, 2007 (documents 03956-1669 through 03956-1678) for case number 31EMM108062. The BellSouth results show "No records were found" for the target number queried — the number itself is redacted under b3/b6/b7C. Verizon Wireless responded August 8, 2006 (document 03956-1681) and a second time for a different number, with call records and subscriber information fully redacted. The FBI was systematically mapping who was communicating with whom — the identities behind those communications remain hidden. All subpoenas issued from FBI West Palm Beach Field Office, 505 S. Flagler Drive, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401. Source: FBI Vault Part 04, documents 03956-1587 through 03956-1687 · Civil Action #17-cv-03956.

FBI evidence intake form FD-340 (document 03956-1629), dated February 8, 2007, contains the case title field reading "JEFFREY EPSTEIN — WSTA-CHILD PROSTITUTION." The designation "WSTA" refers to the White Slave Traffic Act (18 U.S.C. § 2421 et seq.), the federal statute covering sex trafficking and interstate transportation for the purpose of prostitution. This is significant because the White Slave Traffic Act carries federal jurisdiction and serious penalties — yet the case was ultimately resolved with a state-level plea deal and a sweetheart non-prosecution agreement that buried the federal charges. The FBI's own evidence form, filed in February 2007, confirms federal investigators were treating this as a federal White Slave Traffic Act case — the same charges that were quietly abandoned when Acosta struck the 2008 deal. Field Office: AQ (Albuquerque). The interview subject whose name appears on the form is redacted under b6-5/b7C-5. Source: FBI Vault Part 04, document 03956-1629 · Civil Action #17-cv-03956.

The 1A Envelope index for Part 04 (document 03956-1587) lists item 1 as "PHOTO LINE UP POSITIVE ID OF [REDACTED]" — a formal photographic lineup in which a witness or victim positively identified a specific individual. The identified person's name is redacted under b3/b6/b7C. Photo lineups are used in criminal investigations when a witness has seen a suspect and can identify them from a set of photographs — the "positive ID" notation confirms the identification was made successfully. Item 2 is "ORIGINAL NOTES RE INTERVIEW OF [REDACTED]" — handwritten interview notes, also with the subject redacted. Items 5–9 document multiple rounds of MySpace subpoena returns and a final subpoena return whose subject is redacted. The photo lineup is among the most significant items catalogued in Part 04: it documents that at least one witness looked at photographs and successfully identified a specific individual connected to the investigation. That person's identity remains hidden. Source: FBI Vault Part 04, document 03956-1587 · 1A Envelope Index · Civil Action #17-cv-03956.

The Part 05 Deleted Page Information Sheet confirms 525 total deleted pages, every one of which carries b3-1. Exemption b3-1 under FOIA refers to material exempted by a specific statute — in this context, b3-1 is the standard FBI designation for Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e), the grand jury secrecy rule. Rule 6(e) prohibits disclosure of grand jury proceedings, testimony, and subpoenas. Its consistent application across all 525 pages means this entire Part consists of grand jury material — almost certainly a combination of grand jury subpoenas, witness testimony transcripts presented to the grand jury, and potentially draft indictment documents. This is the first Part in the FBI Vault release where b3 is the primary and universal exemption. In Parts 01–04, b3 appeared alongside other exemptions on select pages. In Part 05, it appears on every single page without exception. Source: FBI Vault Part 05 Deleted Page Information Sheet · Civil Action #17-cv-03956.

Unlike Parts 02, 03, and 04 — which contained b7D (confidential source/witness identity) exemptions protecting informant identities — Part 05 has no b7D anywhere. This distinction is critical. b7D protects witnesses who cooperated with investigators. b3-1 protects grand jury proceedings under Rule 6(e). The absence of b7D means these pages are not the same category of witness interview summaries seen in earlier Parts. Instead, the universal b6/b7C alongside b3-1 indicates that names in grand jury materials are being withheld — the identities of individuals who testified before or were subjects of the grand jury, the targets named in grand jury subpoenas, and potentially the identities of grand jurors themselves. Every one of the 525 pages contains at least one name-level redaction. The total number of distinct individuals named across these 525 pages is unknown. Source: FBI Vault Part 05 Deleted Page Information Sheet · Civil Action #17-cv-03956.

Scattered across Part 05 are 31 pages that carry an additional exemption: b7E (law enforcement techniques and procedures). These pages are: 41, 42, 49, 58, 59, 75, 86, 90, 91, 96, 159, 185, 232, 233, 236, 358, 363, 364, 367, 368, 401, 410, 411, 416, 448, 471, 487, 492, 493, 525, 526. The presence of b7E within grand jury material suggests that specific pages contain descriptions of surveillance methods, undercover techniques, or investigative procedures that were either presented to the grand jury as evidence or discussed in the context of how evidence was gathered. The scattered distribution — clustered somewhat in the early pages and again in the 350–530 range — may indicate these are sections of testimony or exhibits describing how the FBI conducted specific surveillance operations. This pattern, combined with the b7E-8 appearances seen in Part 03, increasingly suggests the Epstein investigation involved active electronic surveillance or undercover operations whose existence the FBI continues to protect. Source: FBI Vault Part 05 Deleted Page Information Sheet · b7E page pattern analysis · Civil Action #17-cv-03956.

The existence of 525 pages of grand jury material confirms what investigative reporting has long suggested: a federal grand jury was convened in connection with the Epstein case. Grand jury proceedings are typically initiated when prosecutors believe they have sufficient evidence to seek an indictment. The FBI had described their case as strong enough for a federal life sentence by 2007. A grand jury was the next logical step — and apparently was taken. Yet no federal indictment was ever issued. Instead, in 2008, U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta signed a non-prosecution agreement granting Epstein and unnamed co-conspirators broad federal immunity. The 525 pages in Part 05 represent what that grand jury heard, saw, and considered — the names, the testimony, the evidence — before the decision was made to abandon the federal case and accept a state plea deal that sent Epstein to a private jail wing for 13 months. The contents of those grand jury proceedings remain sealed under Rule 6(e). The question of whether the evidence presented to that grand jury implicated individuals beyond Epstein — individuals whose names appear on those 525 pages — has never been answered publicly. This analysis is an inference drawn from the exemption pattern and documented case history, not from released document content. Source: Cross-analysis of FBI Vault Part 05 exemption pattern and documented case history · Civil Action #17-cv-03956.

Donald Trump — Mentioned 38,000+ times across 5,300+ files per New York Times analysis. Includes a spreadsheet of unsubstantiated FBI tip complaints filed before the 2020 election, and framed photographs of Trump at Epstein's Manhattan mansion. Trump has denied any wrongdoing and has not been charged. He stated their friendship ended in the mid-2000s. DOJ temporarily removed then restored one file containing Trump-related tips. The White House said the documents contain "untrue and sensationalist claims." Sources: NYT, CBS News, CNN — secondary; DOJ release — primary.

Bill Clinton — Mentioned frequently. Referenced in documents alleging a trip to Thailand with Epstein. One witness allegedly testified Epstein said "Clinton likes them young." Clinton denied all allegations and stated he had no contact with Epstein for nearly 20 years. Not charged with any offense. Source: NPR, CBS News — secondary.

Ehud Barak — Former Israeli Prime Minister. Named in a witness video (Alfredo Rodriguez testimony). Alleged to have flown with girls on Epstein's plane. Also scheduled for dinner with Epstein, Tom Barrack, and Russian diplomat Vitaly Churkin in August 2016. Source: CBS News — secondary.

George Mitchell — Former U.S. Senate Majority Leader. A witness in a CBS News-reviewed video states Mitchell was at Epstein's house "every day" asking for donations. Mitchell denied the allegations. The George J. Mitchell Scholarship was renamed on February 1, 2026 following the disclosures. Source: CBS News — secondary.

Bill Richardson — Late former New Mexico Governor. Named by Virginia Giuffre in depositions as someone Epstein directed her to have sexual encounters with. Richardson denied the allegations. Source: NPR — secondary.

Al Gore — Former U.S. Vice President. Named in court documents from the 2015 Giuffre civil lawsuit. No allegations of wrongdoing. Source: NPR — secondary.

Peter Mandelson — Former UK politician and EU Trade Commissioner. UK criminal inquiry launched after records in the DOJ release showed approximately $75,000 in three payments from Epstein in 2003–2004 to accounts linked to Mandelson or his partner. Source: Al Jazeera, Feb 14, 2026 — secondary.

Tom Barrack — Former Trump ally and inaugural committee chairman. Email exchanges with Epstein documented in the release. Epstein asked Barrack to download Signal encrypted messaging. Scheduled dinner with Epstein, Ehud Barak, and Vitaly Churkin in August 2016. Source: CBS News — secondary.

Ro Khanna / Thomas Massie — U.S. Representatives who led passage of the Epstein Files Transparency Act. After viewing unredacted files, Khanna identified Emirati businessman Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem as one of six men whose names had been improperly redacted. Massie's pressure caused DOJ to unredact Les Wexner's name. Source: CNN, Wikipedia — secondary.

Les Wexner — Billionaire founder of Victoria's Secret and The Limited. Listed as a co-conspirator in FBI documents. His name was initially redacted but unredacted after pressure from Rep. Thomas Massie. Paid Epstein approximately $200 million in fees between 1999–2018. Wexner severed ties with Epstein around 2007 and later said he was "deceived" by him. Source: Wikipedia, NBC News — secondary; DOJ release — primary.

Bill Gates — Microsoft co-founder. Extensive philanthropic coordination with Epstein documented. Epstein sent unverified self-addressed emails alleging Gates had extramarital relations. Gates's wife Melinda was reportedly uncomfortable with the association. Gates wrote "I enjoyed the breakfast a lot" to Epstein in December 2014. A House Oversight Committee photo shows Gates and Prince Andrew near a plane. Gates denied all allegations of wrongdoing and called meeting Epstein "a serious error in judgment." Source: CBS News, CNN, Feb 2026 — secondary.

Elon Musk — CEO of Tesla, SpaceX, DOGE. A November 2012 email shows Musk asking Epstein "What day/night will be the wildest party on your island?" Musk has stated he declined all invitations to the island. Not accused of wrongdoing. Musk's past tweet alleging Trump was "in the Epstein files" was later deleted. Source: NBC News, Wikipedia — secondary.

Leon Black — Private equity billionaire (Apollo Global Management). Paid Epstein approximately $170 million in fees. One of two primary fee-paying clients identified in financial records. Source: Forbes 2025, Wikipedia — secondary.

Howard Lutnick — Now U.S. Commerce Secretary. Email exchanges show plans to visit Epstein's island with his wife during Christmas 2012. Whether the trip occurred is unclear. Not accused of wrongdoing. Source: NBC News — secondary.

Reid Hoffman — LinkedIn co-founder. Named in reporting on the files. Source: Helsinki Times — secondary.

Peter Thiel — Venture capitalist, PayPal co-founder. Named in multiple analyses of the files. Source: Wikipedia, Helsinki Times — secondary.

Sergey Brin — Google co-founder. Documented as having visited Epstein's island and planning to visit Epstein's New York home. Source: Wikipedia — secondary.

Glenn Dubin — Hedge fund billionaire. Named by Virginia Giuffre in depositions as someone Epstein directed her to have sexual encounters with. Dubin denied the allegations. Source: NPR — secondary.

Jes Staley — Former Barclays CEO. Named in financial documents. Under regulatory investigation related to Epstein connections. Source: Helsinki Times — secondary.

Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem — Emirati businessman. Identified by Rep. Ro Khanna as one of six men whose names were improperly redacted by the DOJ. Source: Wikipedia — secondary.

Prince Andrew (Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor) — Photos released by DOJ show Andrew on all fours over an unidentified woman on the floor, and in another crouching over her while staring at the camera. Virginia Giuffre alleged Andrew sexually assaulted her starting at age 17. Andrew denied having sex with Giuffre but settled her lawsuit for an undisclosed sum. Giuffre died by suicide in 2025. Following the DOJ release, Andrew was arrested by British authorities on February 19, 2026, on charges related to sharing sensitive government data. Source: CBS News, PBS — secondary; DOJ release photos — primary.

Woody Allen — Filmmaker. A May 2015 text exchange shows Epstein asking Allen about a "day museum White House trip." Allen replied about his "rap sheet." No accusations of wrongdoing related to Epstein. Source: CBS News — secondary.

Mick Jagger — Musician. Mentioned in earlier document batches. No accusations of wrongdoing. Source: CBS News — secondary.

Kevin Spacey — Actor. Named in the 2015 Giuffre civil lawsuit documents. No accusations of wrongdoing related to Epstein. Source: NPR — secondary.

Richard Branson — Virgin Group founder. His company stated any dealings with Epstein were "limited to group or business settings" and that Branson decided not to see Epstein again after his team uncovered serious allegations. Source: PBS — secondary.

Naomi Campbell — Supermodel. Named in Helsinki Times analysis of the files. No specific allegations. Source: Helsinki Times — secondary.

Courtney Love — Musician. Named in Helsinki Times analysis. Source: Helsinki Times — secondary.

Larry Summers — Former Harvard president and economist. Named in earlier document batches. No accusations of wrongdoing. Source: CBS News — secondary.

David Copperfield — Magician. Named in the 2015 Giuffre civil lawsuit court documents. No accusations of wrongdoing related to Epstein. Source: NPR — secondary.

Steve Tisch — New York Giants co-owner and film producer (Forrest Gump). Email exchanges with Epstein documented. Tisch stated he had "a brief association" discussing "adult women, movies, philanthropy, and investments" and that he never visited Epstein's island. Source: PBS, CBS News — secondary.

Casey Wasserman — President of the 2028 LA Olympics Committee. Exchanged flirty emails with Ghislaine Maxwell in 2003. No accusations of wrongdoing related to Epstein's crimes. Source: PBS — secondary.

Alan Dershowitz — Attorney who represented Epstein in the 2008 case. A witness (Alfredo Rodriguez video) states Dershowitz was at Epstein's home several times, usually having wine by the pool but not going upstairs. Virginia Giuffre sued Dershowitz alleging he raped her six times — she later withdrew that claim in 2022, stating she "may have made a mistake." Dershowitz denied all allegations. Source: CBS News — secondary.

Kathryn Ruemmler — Former White House Counsel under Obama (2011–2014), now Chief Legal Officer at Goldman Sachs. A December 2015 email shows Ruemmler writing "I adore him. It's like having another older brother!" after Epstein offered to buy her a first-class ticket to Europe. She stated in 2023 "I regret ever knowing Jeffrey Epstein." Source: CBS News — secondary.

Alex Acosta — Former U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida. Negotiated the 2008 non-prosecution agreement. A 2020 DOJ OPR review found he used "poor judgment." Acosta resigned as Trump's Labor Secretary in 2019 when questions resurfaced about the deal. Source: NPR, CNN — secondary.

JPMorgan Chase & Deutsche Bank — Both banks maintained accounts connected to Epstein for years after his 2008 conviction. JPMorgan paid $75 million to the U.S. Virgin Islands government; Deutsche Bank paid $75 million to settle Epstein survivor claims. Both settlements included no admission of wrongdoing. Source: NPR — secondary.

Noam Chomsky — Academic and political commentator. Named in Wikipedia's analysis of Epstein associates. No allegations of wrongdoing. Source: Wikipedia — secondary.

This is one of the most serious documented failures of the DOJ release. Attorney Brad Edwards, representing hundreds of Epstein survivors, told ABC News the release contained "literally thousands of mistakes" — victim names and identifying information appearing unredacted, including women whose names had never previously been publicly linked to Epstein. Meanwhile, known co-conspirators and associates had their names redacted.

A joint survivor statement declared: "This latest release of Jeffrey Epstein files is being sold as transparency, but what it actually does is expose survivors. Once again, survivors are having their names and identifying information exposed, while the men who abused us remain hidden and protected. That is outrageous."

Skye Roberts, brother of the late Virginia Giuffre, stated the DOJ was "redacting the names of perpetrators and unredacting the names of victims — quite the opposite of what the Epstein Files Transparency Act was meant to do."

Rep. Jamie Raskin, after reviewing unredacted files, accused the DOJ of "obscuring information through unexplained redactions." Reps. Khanna and Massie wrote to DOJ: "We have seen a blanket approach to redactions in some areas, while in other cases, victim names were not redacted at all."

Deputy AG Todd Blanche acknowledged "mistakes are inevitable" and encouraged people to email EFTA@usdoj.gov with problems. The DOJ has admitted to improperly redacting names of individuals — including co-conspirators — who should have been named under the Act.

This site does not name victims. Any victim names that appeared in the DOJ release are not reproduced here. The perpetrators and enablers are the subject of this site's analysis.

DOJ Epstein Library — justice.gov/epstein
The official DOJ repository. All 12 Data Sets are accessible here after age verification.

DOJ Disclosures — All 12 Data Sets
Direct links to Sets 1–12 file listings.

FBI Vault — Jeffrey Epstein Files (Parts 01–22)
The 22-Part FBI Vault release. Directly linkable to specific pages — used throughout this site's Vault section.

House Oversight Committee — Epstein Records Release
8,624 documents released by the House Oversight Committee, archived at Jmail.

Epstein Files Transparency Act — Full Text (H.R. 4405)
The law that compelled the DOJ release. Signed by President Trump, November 2025.

Jmail — Searchable Epstein Files Archive
As of February 19, 2026, Jmail has archived 1,412,250 files and 2,474,242 pages from the DOJ release and House Oversight documents. The most comprehensive publicly searchable archive of the Epstein files. Independent project.

GitHub — Epstein Files Public Archive Index
Public archive index aggregating official download URLs, community mirrors, torrent magnets, and integrity verification to ensure long-term accessibility of all 12 datasets.

CBS News — Live Updates: Epstein Files DOJ Release 2026
CBS News is reviewing documents in collaboration with NBC, Versant, and the Associated Press. One of the most comprehensive ongoing news analyses.

CBS News — Bill Gates, Elon Musk & Notable Names
Detailed reporting on specific named individuals and what the documents show.

CNN — Live: DOJ Epstein Files Release Jan 30, 2026
CNN live coverage including the draft indictment reveal, NPA details, and victim exposure criticism.

CNN — 5 Early Takeaways From the DOJ's Epstein Files Drop
Key analysis of the most significant findings from the Jan 30 release.

CNN — Bill Gates Faces Fresh Scrutiny Over Epstein Ties
In-depth reporting on Gates-Epstein correspondence and philanthropic coordination.

NBC News — DOJ Releases Millions of Pages of Epstein Files
Comprehensive Jan 30 release coverage including Musk island email and Lutnick trip plans.

PBS — A List of Powerful Men Named in the Epstein Files
AP-sourced comprehensive named individuals list.

PBS — Latest Release: Famous Names & Investigation Details
AP reporting on the Jan 30 release and who appears in correspondence.

Al Jazeera — Visual Guide to the Epstein Files (Feb 10, 2026)
Excellent visual breakdown of what each dataset contains and the overall scope of the release.

NPR — Court Records Reveal Named Individuals
Coverage of the 2015 Giuffre civil lawsuit documents naming associates.

Helsinki Times — Inside a Depraved Transatlantic Elite
International perspective on the political and institutional fallout across Europe and the US.

Wikipedia — Epstein Files (continuously updated)
Comprehensive running summary of the entire release, updated daily. Includes international investigations triggered by the files.

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, formerly Prince Andrew, was arrested by Thames Valley Police on February 19, 2026 — the first arrest of a senior member of the British royal family in 379 years. He was arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office, related to alleged sharing of sensitive government information during his time as Britain's trade envoy. He was released approximately 11 hours later, meaning he has been neither charged nor cleared. King Charles III issued a statement saying "the law must take its course." Andrew has denied all wrongdoing. Virginia Giuffre, who accused Andrew of sexually abusing her three times when she was 17, died by suicide in 2025. Andrew settled her lawsuit in 2022 for an undisclosed sum without admitting liability. British royal biographer Andrew Lownie has warned the fallout could "bring down King Charles" as scrutiny intensifies over what he knew of his brother's conduct. Source: NBC News, Al Jazeera, Feb 19–24, 2026.

Peter Mandelson, former UK Cabinet minister, EU Trade Commissioner, and British Ambassador to the United States (appointed by PM Keir Starmer in 2025), was arrested on February 23, 2026 on suspicion of misconduct in public office. He was released on bail after hours of questioning. He is accused of sharing sensitive trade-related government documents with Epstein while serving as a government minister in the early 2000s. In a 2008 email exchange, when Epstein reported he had been sentenced to 18 months in prison for sex trafficking, Mandelson replied: "I think the world of you and I feel hopeless and furious about what has happened." Mandelson had already been fired as UK Ambassador to the US and had resigned from the Labour Party and the House of Lords before his arrest. His arrest triggered the resignation of PM Starmer's chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney. UK financial records also showed approximately $75,000 in payments from Epstein in 2003–2004 to accounts linked to Mandelson. Source: NBC News, Al Jazeera, Feb 23, 2026.

Thorbjørn Jagland, former Prime Minister of Norway (1996–1997) and former Secretary-General of the Council of Europe (2009–2019), has been charged with "gross corruption" after documents in the DOJ release revealed he and his family accepted trips to Epstein properties in New York and Florida, and that he visited Epstein's private island, with Epstein covering his expenses and those of his family. This makes Jagland the first person to face criminal charges directly because of substance revealed in the DOJ release — not just because of their presence in the files. Norwegian diplomats Mona Juul and Terje Rød-Larsen also faced inquiries: Juul stepped down from her post and had her security clearance withdrawn, while Rød-Larsen (formerly of the International Peace Institute) appears in files describing Epstein as a close friend. Source: NBC News, Al Jazeera, Prism News, Feb 2026.

France opened two separate investigations following the DOJ release. First, Paris Public Prosecutor Laure Beccuau opened probes into alleged human trafficking and possible financial wrongdoing, urging Epstein survivors to come forward. Second, the National Financial Prosecutor's Office opened a separate investigation into former French Culture Minister Jack Lang (age 86) for suspected "laundering of the proceeds of tax evasion" — following reporting by French investigative outlet Mediapart about a company set up jointly by Epstein and Lang's daughter Caroline in the U.S. Virgin Islands (named Prytanee). The Arab World Institute in Paris, where Lang served as president, was searched by French police. Lang resigned and denied the accusations. Caroline Lang told France TV she knew Epstein as an art collector, was unaware of his crimes, and was "horrified" when he was arrested in 2019. Source: NBC News, Al Jazeera, Feb 2026.

British police established a national coordination group to review Epstein's ties to Britain and prominent UK figures. Metropolitan Police confirmed investigation into Peter Mandelson (leading to his arrest Feb 23). Thames Valley Police confirmed assessment of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor for misconduct in public office (leading to his arrest Feb 19). British police also assessed Epstein-related private flights that used Stansted Airport. Sarah Ferguson (Duchess of York, ex-wife of Prince Andrew) was also named — correspondence shows Epstein made travel arrangements for her and she visited his residence with her two daughters; her charity trust Sarah's Trust shut down. Latvia and Lithuania launched pretrial probes into alleged trafficking links with modeling agencies named in the DOJ documents. The EU's anti-fraud unit (OLAF) also opened a probe. Source: NBC News, Al Jazeera, Prism News, Feb 2026.

Despite 9+ international investigations, the U.S. has opened no new domestic prosecutions. Attorney General Pam Bondi stated the case "remains open" but a DOJ and FBI memo from late 2025 described an "exhaustive review" finding no evidence of an "incriminating client list" or evidence leading to additional prosecutions of third parties. Former federal prosecutor Mimi Rocah stated: "Right now, the government in charge has no interest in pursuing this, whereas the governments in other countries, for whatever reasons, do." Legal experts note hurdles: while there is no federal statute of limitations for child sex abuse or sex trafficking, most other federal crimes have 5–10 year limits. The UK has no statute of limitations for jury-triable crimes, which explains its more aggressive posture. Crucially, 54 pages of summaries and notes from three FBI interviews with a woman who also made allegations against Donald Trump appear to be missing from the release. Rep. Ro Khanna and others accused the DOJ of still withholding FBI 302 victim interview statements, a draft indictment, prosecution memoranda, and hundreds of thousands of emails from Epstein's computers. Source: NBC News, Wikipedia, Feb–Mar 2026.

A 69-page document marked "law enforcement sensitive" — heavily redacted — reveals a previously undisclosed DEA investigation opened December 17, 2010 in New York. It targeted Epstein and 14 other individuals for suspicious money transfers "possibly linked to illegal narcotics." The document states: "DEA reporting indicates the above individuals are involved in illegitimate wire transfers which are tied to illicit drug and/or prostitution activities occurring in the U.S. Virgin Islands and New York City." The names of all 14 other targets remain redacted. The DEA filed a request to an Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces Fusion Center in Virginia. For the DEA to open the case, there had to be a drug nexus. A law enforcement source told CBS News the Fusion Center request indicated this was a "significant" investigation, not routine. This investigation ran for at least five years and was previously completely unknown to the public. Source: CBS News, Jan 30, 2026 · DOJ Release

The DOJ release includes a 46-minute video of a sting operation in which Alfredo Rodriguez — Epstein's former butler — attempts to sell Epstein's "little black book" to an undercover FBI agent in a hotel room in Boca Raton, Florida on November 3, 2009. Rodriguez had previously given a sworn statement in the original 2006 investigation. He was arrested after this meeting and subsequently charged with obstruction of justice for failing to turn over Epstein's contact book when previously interviewed by law enforcement or in response to civil subpoenas. Rodriguez's arrest and the content of the black book he tried to sell are primary source evidence of Epstein's network of contacts. Source: CBS News, Jan 30, 2026.

A prosecution memorandum addressed to then-U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta — released in the DOJ files — recommended presenting a sealed indictment to a grand jury on May 15, 2007 and arresting Epstein days later. The draft 60-count federal indictment alleged that from 2001 to 2005, Epstein and three unnamed defendants conspired to procure females under 18 for sexual conduct. The memo noted "possible credibility challenges" with some victims, including one who "was the youngest girl and the one who brought Epstein's activities to light." The charges that were considered and rejected included money laundering. Instead of the 60-count federal indictment, Epstein received an 18-month state sentence and a secret non-prosecution agreement protecting unnamed co-conspirators. Rep. Ro Khanna and others have noted the prosecution memorandum itself remains partially withheld from the public release. Source: CBS News, CNN, Jan 30, 2026 · DOJ Release

According to legal experts and survivor advocates who reviewed the release, 54 pages of summaries and notes from three FBI interviews with a woman who also made an allegation against Donald Trump are missing from what was released. The DOJ temporarily removed then restored one file containing Trump-related information. The White House stated the documents contain "untrue and sensationalist claims." Beyond these 54 pages, Reps. Khanna and Massie accused the DOJ of still withholding: FBI 302 victim interview statements, the full draft indictment and prosecution memoranda from the 2007 Florida investigation, and hundreds of thousands of emails and files from Epstein's computers. Deputy AG Todd Blanche stated the January 30 release brought the department "into compliance" with the Epstein Files Transparency Act — but he acknowledged "mistakes are inevitable." The DOJ stated it had released approximately half of the originally identified 6 million responsive pages, citing "over-collection" for the rest. Source: NBC News, Wikipedia, Feb–Mar 2026.

CBS News analysis of over 100 texts and email exchanges in the DOJ documents found that Thomas Barrack — now U.S. Ambassador to Turkey and Trump's special envoy to Syria — maintained regular, close contact with Epstein for years after Epstein's 2008 conviction. Their correspondence continued even as Barrack became a prolific fundraiser for Trump. In emails, Epstein asked Barrack to download Signal encrypted messaging. A personalized August 2016 schedule shows Barrack scheduled for dinner with Epstein, former Israeli PM Ehud Barak, and Russian diplomat Vitaly Churkin. The pattern of post-conviction contact with Epstein despite knowledge of his criminal history is among the most significant findings across the email evidence. Source: CBS News, Jan 30, 2026.

A CBS News analysis published March 3, 2026 found that the DOJ's current public Epstein database is more than 65,000 pages shorter than the tranche initially released on January 30, 2026. This is on top of the nearly 3 million pages that were never released at all from the 6 million identified as potentially responsive.

The DOJ confirmed to CBS News that 47,635 files remain offline — but insisted it has "not deleted any files from the library." DOJ spokeswoman Natalie Baldassarre said they are being reviewed and will be re-released with additional redactions and that the department's "analysis appears to be fundamentally flawed." She said the files would be "ready for re-production by end of the week" — though no complete re-release has occurred as of this writing (March 5, 2026).

The gap between 47,635 files and 65,000+ pages suggests the removed files are not single-page documents — they include multi-page records. No independent verification of the DOJ's stated reasons has been possible because the files are no longer publicly accessible for comparison. Links to offline files return a "page not found" error on the DOJ website.

The DOJ has provided three justifications for removals: (1) victim concerns and counsel flagging documents for additional redaction review; (2) the need to redact personally identifiable information and sexually explicit imagery; and (3) protection of materials related to "ongoing investigations." Critics note that the DOJ itself decides what constitutes an "ongoing investigation" — with no independent review of that designation.

What has been identified in the removed files so far: The NPR investigation (Feb 24) and CBS News analysis (March 3) together identified the following categories of removed content:
— FBI interview summaries of a woman who accused both Epstein and Trump of sexual assault when she was 13 (3 of 4 interviews still missing from public database)
— An interview with the same woman's mother, removed after initial publication, containing the quote: "a prince and DONALD TRUMP visited EPSTEIN's house"
— One interview with a Maxwell trial witness containing a "fleeting mention" of Trump (removed, later restored Feb 19)
— The full set of FBI 302 victim interview statements from both the Florida (2007) and New York (2019) investigations
— The 53-page draft indictment and 82-page prosecution memorandum from the 2007 Florida investigation — only partial versions released
— The bulk of hundreds of thousands of emails and files from Epstein's computers
— Names of at least 5 of the 6 men Rep. Khanna identified as improperly redacted (only Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem was publicly named)

What remains unknown about the 65,000+ removed pages: whether any involve named associates beyond Trump; what additional victims are implicated; whether the files include the three co-conspirators named (but redacted) in the 2007 draft indictment; and whether materials relate to international investigations now underway in the UK, France, Norway, Latvia, Lithuania, and the EU.

Following NPR's February 24 investigation, what began as a Democratic-led demand became bipartisan. Rep. James Comer (R-KY), Republican Chair of the House Oversight Committee, announced February 25–26 that he plans to investigate the DOJ's handling of the missing files — joining ranking member Rep. Robert Garcia (D-CA), who had already demanded answers from AG Pam Bondi.

This is significant: Comer is a Trump ally who chairs the committee. His willingness to investigate the DOJ over missing Epstein files related to Trump allegations indicates the issue has enough documented factual substance to force even allied Republicans to respond.

The DOJ has not responded to follow-up questions from NPR regarding the specific files, their contents, and why they have not been published. The DOJ Rapid Response account stated: "As the Department of Justice has consistently said and has done since the January 30, 2026 publication of the Epstein files, if any member of the public, including victims, reported concerns with information in the pages, the Department would review, make any corrections..." — without specifically addressing missing files identified by serial number cross-referencing in the NPR investigation.

Democrats on the House Oversight Committee have labeled the DOJ's withholding a potential crime under the Epstein Files Transparency Act.

NPR's serial number investigation found that a woman who accused Epstein of abusing her starting at age 13 around 1983 — and who also alleged Trump sexually assaulted her during an introduction arranged by Epstein — was interviewed by the FBI four times. Only the first interview (July 24, 2019, which does not mention Trump) is publicly available. The FBI's own internal "Serial Report" and Maxwell case discovery log confirm at least 15 documents related to this woman — only 7 are in the public database.

The FBI's National Threat Operations Center had circulated Epstein-related allegations mentioning Trump in late July and early August 2025. An internal DOJ PowerPoint slide deck detailed "prominent names" in the Epstein/Maxwell investigations. The woman's allegation — that around 1983, when she was approximately 13 years old, Epstein introduced her to Trump "who subsequently forced her head down to his exposed penis which she subsequently bit. In response, Trump punched her in the head and kicked her out" — appeared in that presentation. A July 22, 2025 internal FBI note states Trump's name was in the case files and that "one identified victim claimed abuse by Trump but ultimately refused to cooperate."

Rep. Robert Garcia personally traveled to the DOJ to review unredacted files and confirmed the missing interviews are not there — meaning they are not merely withheld from the public but appear absent from the DOJ's own Congressional-accessible collection. Garcia stated: "There is definitely, in my opinion, evidence of a cover-up happening. Why are these documents missing? These documents I personally saw, I know who the survivor is... and there are documents missing from the same survivor that appeared to be interviews with the FBI. The FBI clearly investigated, and now those documents are gone."

Trump has denied all allegations and has not been charged with any offense. The White House stated Trump "has been totally exonerated on anything relating to Epstein."

A second woman's FBI interview was published January 30, then removed from the DOJ database without announcement, then republished February 19, 2026. Document metadata confirmed the removal to NPR. In that interview, the woman described being taken by Epstein to Trump's Mar-a-Lago club when she was approximately 13 years old. The interview states: "EPSTEIN told TRUMP, 'This is a good one, huh.'" A related 2020 civil lawsuit states both men chuckled and she "felt uncomfortable, but, at the time, was too young to understand why."

Also related to this woman: a separate FBI interview with her mother — in which the mother recalled hearing "a prince and DONALD TRUMP visited EPSTEIN's house," which made her "think that if they are there then how could EPSTEIN be a criminal" — was also removed. As of CBS News's March 3 analysis, the mother's interview remains offline. The DOJ told NPR the file "required additional redactions" and "will be reposted soon."

A third related document — a separate interview with a different witness containing a "fleeting mention" of Trump — was also removed and later restored.

The DOJ's stated reason for all removals is victim or counsel flagging for review. The pattern of removals clustering around Trump-related documents — while non-Trump content remained online — is the basis for the bipartisan Congressional investigation.

Records released in the DOJ files confirm that in June 2024 — five years after Epstein's death — an FBI agent received authorization to destroy evidence item 1B60: the master recording of archived video images from the Metropolitan Correctional Center in Manhattan, where Epstein was found dead on August 10, 2019. An agent wrote that the case had been closed and that a prosecutor concurred with "standard evidence-handling procedures." Under FBI policy, if evidence remains undisposed the investigative file must remain open — meaning the destruction formally allowed the FBI to close the case.

By mid-2025, under public pressure, the DOJ sought to reconstruct the footage. Agents located what they described as another copy on a NiceVision digital video recorder at the jail. The FBI specialist who reviewed the system described the discovery as a "theory that could not be tested." Security experts told CBS News that recurring recording gaps in the footage would be unusual in a properly functioning system. Congress released the complete footage in September 2025, including a previously missing minute — which showed no unusual activity at Epstein's cell door.

The original master copy is gone. The "rediscovered" copy cannot be independently verified as unaltered or complete.

At the January 30 press conference, Deputy AG Todd Blanche stated that of 6 million total pages, the DOJ was withholding nearly 3 million for the following reasons:

— Child sexual abuse material (CSAM) — images and videos of child sexual abuse which cannot legally be published
— Victim personally identifiable information — names, addresses, contact details, medical records
— Legal privilege — approximately 200,000 pages withheld as attorney-client or deliberative process privileged material
— Ongoing cases — materials related to active federal investigations (the DOJ declined to specify which)
— "Over-collection" — Blanche stated the original 6 million figure included material collected through "over-collection" — i.e., documents swept in by broad search terms that the DOJ determined were not truly responsive to the Transparency Act

Critics including Reps. Khanna and Massie argued that the DOJ was using "over-collection" and "ongoing case" designations to suppress materials that are clearly covered by the Act. Khanna stated: "If we found six men that they were hiding in two hours, imagine how many men they are covering up for in those 3 million files." Julie K. Brown of the Miami Herald, whose investigative reporting helped expose Epstein's network eight years ago, told PBS NewsHour: "It shows that this case is still an example of how there are two systems of justice in this country, one for people who have money and power and one for people who don't."

The DOJ released 16 new pages on March 5 covering three previously withheld FBI 302 interview memos. The DOJ said 15 documents were "incorrectly coded as duplicative." More than 1,000 total new pages were published alongside what appears to be the complete 2006 Epstein/Maxwell case file. Five prosecution memos the Southern District of Florida had labeled privileged were also released in redacted form.

What the newly released files say — full detail:
In her second interview, the woman described Epstein taking her to "either New York or New Jersey" when she was between 13 and 15, to "a very tall building with huge rooms." Epstein introduced her to Trump. Trump asked everyone to leave the room, then said words to the effect of "Let me teach you how little girls are supposed to be." He then unzipped his pants and forced her head down. She told agents she "bit the s*** out of it." Trump then struck her and said words to the effect of "get this little bitch the hell out of here."

The woman also told agents that later in the same meeting, she heard Trump and Epstein discuss Epstein blackmailing people, and heard Trump "talking about washing money through casinos." She said she "got the feeling the relationship between EPSTEIN and TRUMP included a certain amount of jealousy. She thought TRUMP appeared jealous of EPSTEIN, but at some point, they ended up on level playing fields."

The woman also reported that Epstein and Trump sometimes used the terms "fresh meat," "untainted," and "not jaded" while referring to girls.

The woman told the FBI her mother was blackmailed by Epstein. After her second FBI interview, she received threatening phone calls and described vehicles trying to run her off the road — which she believed were either connected to Epstein, or if not him, "the other one," referring to Trump. She brought an attorney to three of her four FBI interviews. In her October 2019 final interview, when agents asked if she would provide more detail on the Trump allegations, she asked what the point would be "when there was a strong possibility nothing could be done about it" — and ended the session.

What remains missing: NPR and independent journalist Roger Sollenberger calculate 37 pages still remain absent after the March 5 release — including notes from the interviews, a law enforcement report, and license records. CNN conducted a separate analysis and found dozens of additional 302 witness interview memos missing from the full database — beyond just the Trump accuser files. Well over 100 files in the Maxwell discovery catalog remain unavailable on the DOJ website.

What the FBI did not find or did not say: The newly released documents do not include information about whether agents considered the allegations credible or did additional work to verify or disprove the claims. There is no indication Epstein ever lived in South Carolina. It is unclear whether Trump and Epstein knew each other during the time period involved. The woman was found ineligible for the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program. An internal DOJ note (July 22, 2025) states one victim "claimed abuse by Trump but ultimately refused to cooperate."

Survivor community response: Attorney Brittany Henderson, representing hundreds of Epstein survivors, said over 100 survivors had reported thousands of redaction failures to the DOJ since December 19, 2025. She warned: "After repeated and explicit notice, any future release that exposes the identity of even one single victim will not be a mistake — it will be a choice." Attorney Jennifer Freeman called on DOJ to un-redact perpetrator names that were improperly shielded under the Transparency Act. One unnamed survivor who has been repeatedly re-identified across releases may be forced to go public.

White House and DOJ responses: Press secretary Karoline Leavitt: "These are completely baseless accusations, backed by zero credible evidence, from a sadly disturbed woman who has an extensive criminal history. The total baselessness of these accusations is also supported by the obvious fact that Joe Biden's department of justice knew about them for four years and did nothing with them — because they knew President Trump did absolutely nothing wrong." The DOJ stated: "This production may include fake or falsely submitted images, documents or videos, as everything that was sent to the FBI by the public was included." The woman is not a member of the public — she is an FBI-interviewed witness from 2019. Trump has denied all allegations and has not been charged with any offense.

The DOJ's Rapid Response account posted on X on March 5, 2026: "As Congress knows, the Justice Department is not 'hiding' anything. We have released more than 3 million documents. Any time a redaction error is flagged, we review and RE-PUBLISH that document." The statement added that images from a batch in Data Set 9 were "temporarily pulled down for review due to some flagged for nudity and republished on a rolling basis, including 25,000 yesterday. All will be back in the library by end of day."

This is the DOJ's explanation for the 65,000+ page gap reported by CBS News on March 3. Rep. Nancy Mace directly challenged it, telling reporters after the Bondi subpoena vote: "There's over 65,000 documents missing, and we know there are more than 2,000 videos that are out there. They're not giving Congress all the information or all the documents, and they're obfuscating."

The DOJ has not explained why nudity-flagging would affect call logs, case summaries, or interview documents also absent from the database — categories identified by CBS News in their March 3 analysis as among the removed files.

The House Oversight Committee voted 24–19 on March 4, 2026 to subpoena Attorney General Pam Bondi, compelling her to appear for a closed-door deposition on the DOJ's handling of the Epstein files. Five Republicans joined all Democrats in supporting the subpoena — a bipartisan rebuke of the Trump administration's own attorney general.

The subpoena was introduced by Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC), who stated: "AG Bondi claims the DOJ has released all of the Epstein files. The record is clear: they have not. The Epstein case is one of the greatest cover-ups in American history. Videos are missing. Audio is missing. Logs are missing. There are millions more documents out there." Mace also told reporters: "I have some very pointed questions for her, and I don't want to talk about the Dow" — a reference to Bondi's contentious February 11 hearing appearance in which she praised the stock market when asked about Epstein prosecutions.

The subpoena unlike the Epstein Files Transparency Act requires Bondi to produce the full unredacted files to Congress — including classified materials and documents related to ongoing investigations. If Bondi refuses, any contempt proceeding would land at the DOJ itself — a structural conflict of interest noted by multiple legal analysts.

Darren Indyke — Epstein's personal lawyer since 1986, exclusively employed by Epstein from the 1990s, co-executor of his $600 million estate, and recipient of a $50 million bequest in Epstein's will — is scheduled to appear before the House Oversight Committee in March 2026. Indyke has accepted the subpoena and says he intends to cooperate. His attorney stated the allegations in the subpoena are "false" and that Indyke "did not socialize with Mr. Epstein" and "has always rejected as categorically false any suggestion that he knowingly facilitated or assisted Mr. Epstein in his sexual abuse or trafficking."

Indyke helped establish Epstein's corporate and personal base of operations in the U.S. Virgin Islands. He was involved in almost every aspect of Epstein's business and personal affairs. He and accountant Richard Kahn recently settled a $35 million lawsuit alleging they facilitated Epstein's trafficking network — including allegations they arranged sham marriages between women Epstein was abusing for immigration purposes. The settlement has not yet received judicial approval and includes no admission of misconduct.

Indyke's deposition is one of the most significant scheduled events in the entire Congressional investigation — he has more institutional knowledge of Epstein's operations than almost any other living person.

The House Oversight Committee has asked the following individuals to testify, with depositions to follow the March Indyke and Kahn sessions:

Bill Gates — Microsoft co-founder. Extensive documented post-conviction contact with Epstein including a December 2014 "I enjoyed the breakfast a lot" email. Gates called meeting Epstein "a serious error in judgment."

Kathryn Ruemmler — Goldman Sachs Chief Legal Officer, former White House Counsel under Obama. A December 2015 email shows her writing "I adore him. It's like having another older brother!" about Epstein after he offered to buy her a first-class ticket to Europe. She stated in 2023: "I regret ever knowing Jeffrey Epstein."

Leon Black — Apollo Global Management founder. Paid Epstein approximately $170 million in fees, making him one of Epstein's two primary fee-paying clients.

Ted Waitt — Gateway computer founder and philanthropist. Named in files; specifics of his testimony scope not yet public.

Bill Clinton — Already deposed February 27, 2026. Told members of Congress he "did nothing wrong" in his relationship with Epstein and saw no signs of abuse. Cut ties with Epstein before abuse was publicly known, he said.

Hillary Clinton — Already deposed. Told lawmakers she had no knowledge of Epstein's crimes and did not recall "ever encountering Mr. Epstein."

Les Wexner — Billionaire founder of Victoria's Secret. Already deposed February 18, 2026. Paid Epstein approximately $200 million in fees. Testified he was "deceived" by Epstein.

Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) is separately investigating Epstein's finances based on what the DOJ files show. One Epstein account alone showed 4,725 wire transfers totaling $1.1 billion. Between 1999 and 2018, Epstein's two main businesses — Financial Trust Company and Southern Trust Company — received over $800 million in revenue: approximately $490 million in fees (including ~$200 million from Les Wexner and ~$170 million from Leon Black) and $310 million in investment returns. His Virgin Islands corporations paid an effective tax rate of approximately 4% due to tax exemptions, saving an estimated $300 million. Epstein signed a 32-page trust two days before his death naming 40 beneficiaries of his $600 million estate — including $100 million to girlfriend Karyna Shuliak, $50 million to Darren Indyke, and $25 million to Richard Kahn.

Wyden's financial investigation runs parallel to but separate from the House Oversight depositions. It is the most significant Senate-level financial inquiry into Epstein's money flows to date.

Part 10's deletion log runs pages 1–547. Part 09 begins at page 548 and ends at page 757 — a direct continuation from the same master file, split into separate release tranches. The consistent b3-1/b6-3/b7C-3/b7D-1 exemption pattern across both Parts confirms the entire 757-page document is a single category: grand jury testimony and exhibits with confidential source protection throughout. No portion was released.

Pages 729 and 735 carry only b7D-1 with no b3 or b6/b7C. The same pattern appeared in Part 10. These pages likely represent cover sheets or section dividers whose sole protected content is source identity, separating distinct testimony sections within the grand jury file.

Every page carries the same four exemptions: b3-1 (grand jury secrecy), b6-3 and b7C-3 (elevated name privacy tier applied consistently to grand jury targets across the Vault), and b7D-1 (express confidential source assurance). This is the most structurally uniform Part in the entire release — no variation, no transitions, no mixed sections.

The opening 138 pages carry b3-1 (grand jury secrecy), b6-1 and b7C-1 (standard name privacy), and b7D-1 (express confidential source assurance). This is the opening grand jury section with standard-tier name protection, distinct from the elevated tier used in the file's third section.

Pages 139–276 carry b6-1, b7C-1, and b7D-1 only — no b3. This 138-page block is pure investigative witness material entirely outside the grand jury. These are FBI witness interview records and source communications that were never part of grand jury proceedings.

The final 271 pages return to grand jury material (b3-1) but with higher-tier name protection — b6-3/b7C-3 instead of the b6-1/b7C-1 used in Section 1. The shift within a single file to the elevated sub-variant indicates individuals in this section carry a more sensitive designation — likely grand jury targets or named co-conspirators.

Part 10 introduces b7D-1, not seen in any prior Part (earlier Parts used b7D-2). b7D-1 applies to sources who provided information under an explicit assurance of confidentiality — people who came forward and made a deliberate arrangement with law enforcement, receiving a direct promise they would not be identified. b7D-2 covers implied assurances. Every substantive page of Part 10 carries b7D-1.

Sub-file A spans pages 548–757, the same page range as Part 09. Both are drawn from the same master document in separate tranches. Exemption pattern throughout: b3-1 + b6-3,-5 + b7C-3,-5 + b7D-1. No variation, no b7B. Zero pages released.

The first 11 pages of sub-file B carry b3-1 + b6-3,-5,-7 + b7C-3,-5,-7 + b7D-2. The b6-7 and b7C-7 sub-variants appear here for the first time across all 12 Parts. Prior Parts used only b6-1 (standard) and b6-3 (elevated). This third tier indicates a distinct legal category of name protection not previously required in this file series.

Pages 586–671 carry b7B alongside b3-1, b6-3,-5, and b7D-2 — with b7C completely replaced by b7B. Under FOIA, b7B protects records compiled from a confidential informant where disclosure would reveal their identity. This is legally distinct from b7D (source under assurance) and b7C (general law enforcement privacy). These 86 pages are an organized informant dossier — what the informant told the FBI over time, not just a record of their existence. An 86-page dossier indicates a sustained relationship. Identity, reporting, and timeline remain sealed. First appearance of b7B across all 22 Parts.

Pages 672–890 carry b6-1,-5 + b7C-1,-5 + b7D-2 with no b3. This 219-page block is pure investigative witness material outside the grand jury. The transition from b7B (informant records, pp 586–671) to b7C (general law enforcement records) marks the precise boundary between the compiled informant dossier and the broader witness file.

The first 300 pages carry b3-1 (grand jury secrecy), b6-3 and b7C-3 (elevated name protection consistent with grand jury targets across the Vault), and b7D-2 (implied confidential source assurance). This is the largest single continuous grand jury block in Part 12.

Page 301 carries b6-1, b7C-1, and b7D-5 — with no b3. It is the only page in all 574 carrying b7D-5, and it falls at the precise transition between the grand jury section (pp 1–300) and the witness section (pp 302–574). b7D-5 protects a source whose exposure could endanger national security or foreign intelligence operations. Its position at the file boundary suggests it is an administrative bridging document: a source agreement or certification connecting the two file types and identifying the source under a distinct legal protection category. Most analytically precise single page in the Vault release.

Pages 302–574 carry b6-1,-5 + b7C-1,-5 + b7D-2 with no b3. This 273-page block is pure witness and investigative file material outside the grand jury. The shift from b6-3 (elevated, grand jury tier) in Section 1 to b6-1 (standard) here marks the structural boundary confirmed across Parts 08, 10, 11, and 12.

Part 01: 258. Part 02: 502. Part 03: 434. Part 04: 518. Part 05: 525. Part 06: 519. Part 07: 520. Part 08: 567. Part 09: 210. Part 10: 547. Part 11: 526. Part 12: 574. Total: 5,700 pages deleted. New exemptions identified: b5 (Part 06), b7D-1 (Parts 09–10), b7B (Part 11), b6-7/b7C-7 (Part 11), b7D-5 (Part 12). Ten Parts remain unreviewed.

Sub-file A logs 199 deleted pages with primary exemptions b6-1,-5,-8 / b7C-1,-5,-8 / b7D-2. The b6-8 and b7C-8 sub-variants protect FBI administrative personnel — agents and staff whose identities are shielded from disclosure. Pages with b3-1 indicate grand jury material embedded within the witness file. The pattern confirms this is an investigative witness file that crossed into grand jury proceedings, with FBI personnel names throughout. Zero pages released.

Sub-file B logs 333 deleted pages with the same core pattern as Sub-file A: b6-1,-5,-8 / b7C-1,-5,-8 / b7D-2. The sheer volume — 333 pages in a single sub-file — indicates a substantial and separate investigative file. The b7D-2 exemption throughout confirms implied source confidentiality assurances on virtually every page. Combined with Sub-file A, Part 13 represents 532 pages of withheld witness and grand jury material from a single tranche.

Alongside the deletion logs, Part 13 contains actual FBI-printed internet research documents: screenshots and printed pages from web platforms including MySpace and other sites, dated 2006–2007 and bearing FBI Bates reference numbers in the 03956 series. Names and profile IDs are redacted under b6-3,-5 / b7C-3,-5 / b3-1. These documents confirm the FBI was actively conducting online surveillance of individuals connected to Epstein's network as early as 2006, monitoring their social media profiles, contact lists, and online identities. The redactions indicate the FBI found individuals of investigative significance through this internet monitoring.

Every deleted page in Part 14 carries b7E alongside b6 and b7C. Under FOIA, b7E exempts records that would disclose law enforcement techniques and procedures, or — in its foreign intelligence application — information provided by or relating to a foreign government. Its consistent presence across all 326 pages confirms that the FBI's Epstein investigation involved foreign intelligence equities that remain fully classified. This is the first Part in the 22-Part Vault release where b7E appears. The sub-variants vary: b7E-1 (most common), with b3-1 appearing on pages involving grand jury material.

Part 14 contains extensive printed internet research records: MySpace social media profiles (bearing profile URLs with redacted friend IDs), Citysearch business listings, and other web pages, all printed and Bates-stamped by the FBI in the 03956 series. Dates on the printed pages range from 2006 to 2007. Names, profile IDs, and identifying information are redacted under b6-3,-5 / b7C-3,-5 / b3-1. The volume and variety of platforms monitored confirms the FBI was systematically building digital identity profiles of individuals connected to Epstein — mapping his network through its online footprint at a time when social media was new.

Pages 66 and 67 of the Part 14 deletion log are listed simply as “Duplicate” with no exemption codes. This indicates the FBI was processing multiple document sets in parallel, with some pages appearing in more than one file. The duplicate designation — rare across the Vault — suggests Part 14 was assembled from more than one source file, consistent with the foreign intelligence and standard investigative material appearing side by side throughout.

Page 4 carries b6-2 with no b3 and no b7C. This single-page transition — carrying only standard individual privacy protection — likely represents a cover page or administrative document that precedes the grand jury record. The same transitional pattern has been observed across other Parts where a document changes file type at its opening. After page 4, the uniform grand jury pattern begins and continues without interruption through page 511.

Pages 8 through 511 carry b3-1, b6-3, and b7C-3 without variation. This 503-page continuous block is the largest uninterrupted grand jury section observed in any single Part. The elevated b6-3 / b7C-3 name protection tier — distinct from the standard b6-1 used in investigative witness files — confirms these pages contain names of grand jury targets or co-conspirators throughout. The scale of the deletion is substantial: 503 consecutive pages of grand jury testimony or exhibits, all withheld, all protecting the same category of individuals.

Every page in Part 16 carries b3-1 (grand jury secrecy), b6-3 (elevated individual privacy, grand jury tier), and b7C-3 (elevated law enforcement privacy). This is the largest single-exemption-pattern block in the entire 22-Part Vault release — 515 consecutive pages with zero structural variation. Combined with Part 15’s 503-page block, the two parts form a 1,018-page continuous grand jury record — the single largest withheld document identified in this investigation. Its uniformity across two separate release tranches confirms it is one coherent body of grand jury proceedings.

Parts 15 and 16 together account for 1,026 withheld pages under grand jury secrecy. To put this in context: typical grand jury proceedings in a single criminal case generate hundreds of pages of testimony. A 1,026-page grand jury record withheld in its entirety — with elevated name protection on every single page — indicates either an extraordinarily expansive grand jury investigation, a sprawling network of witnesses and targets, or both. The name protection tier used (b6-3 / b7C-3) is reserved for individuals whose identification poses heightened risk — suggesting grand jury targets of significant status remain unidentified to the public.

Multiple pages in Part 17 contain printed MapQuest driving directions with the origin address listed as 505 S. Flagler Drive, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 — the address of the FBI’s West Palm Beach field office. Destinations are redacted under b6-3 / b7C-3 / b3-1. The dates on the printed pages are from 2006. The FBI was generating route plans from its own field office to locations connected to individuals in the Epstein investigation, confirming active physical surveillance operations in the West Palm Beach area. The direction sheets correspond to multiple distinct destinations, indicating surveillance of more than one location.

Alongside the MapQuest records, Part 17 contains printed MySpace profile pages and what appear to be photographic surveillance images (heavily redacted). Profile IDs, names, and locations are redacted under b6-3,-5 / b7C-3,-5 / b3-1. The simultaneous use of internet surveillance (MySpace) and physical surveillance (MapQuest routing) from the same file confirms the FBI was running parallel digital and physical operations against Epstein network members in 2006–2007 — before the 2008 plea deal effectively shut the investigation down.

The 367-page deletion log carries b3-1, b6-3,-5, b7C-3,-5, and b7E-1. The reappearance of b7E (first seen in Part 14) confirms the foreign intelligence dimension of the investigation persists through Parts 14–17 at minimum. The pairing of b3-1 (grand jury) with b7E-1 (foreign intelligence) on the same pages indicates that foreign intelligence information was presented to or discussed within the grand jury proceedings — an unusually serious intersection that explains why these pages remain fully withheld.

b7E first appeared in Part 14, reappeared in Part 17, and appears again in Part 18. Its presence across three separate release tranches from the same civil action confirms the foreign intelligence dimension of the Epstein investigation is a persistent structural feature — not a one-time inclusion. Individually each instance could be explained away; three consecutive appearances cannot. The FBI’s investigation involved foreign government information or foreign intelligence sources that remain classified across multiple document sets spanning different phases of the 2006–2008 investigation.

Part 18’s deletion log shows b3-1 (grand jury) at the file opening (pages 6, 10–11, 14–22) and then again at specific mid-file intervals, with non-b3 witness material in between. This alternating structure is unusual and indicates the FBI was interleaving grand jury materials with standard investigative files, or that a single document set captured both proceedings simultaneously. The recurrence of grand jury exemptions mid-file suggests the grand jury was still active when this tranche was compiled — consistent with the timeline of the 2006–2007 investigation.

Pages 5–9 carry b6-5 / b7C-5 / b7E-10. The b7E-10 designation is a specific numbered sub-category of the b7E exemption, used when the protected information falls into a distinct classified foreign intelligence classification that the standard b7E-1 does not cover. Its appearance on five consecutive pages at the opening of the file suggests this sub-category is the primary protection reason for a specific document or set of documents embedded at the start of the Part 19 release. Combined with b6-5 and b7C-5 (which protect third-party individuals in law enforcement contexts), these pages likely contain foreign intelligence source information about individuals the FBI was tracking.

Beyond the b7E-10 opening, Part 19 carries b3-1 / b6-1,-3 / b7C-1,-3 across the bulk of its 475 pages. The simultaneous use of b6-1 (standard name protection) and b6-3 (elevated grand jury tier) within the same file confirms both ordinary witnesses and grand jury-designated individuals are named throughout. The mixing of tiers across a 475-page file indicates a large, multi-layered witness and grand jury proceeding was still generating material into the late stages of the 2006–2008 investigation period.

Part 20 contains FBI FD-340 evidence intake forms listing physical items received as evidence in Case ID 31E-MM-108062. Evidence items include: MM 12 (CD-ROM containing toll records), MM 13 (CD containing toll records), MM 14 (subpoena results), MM 15 (administrative subpoena and results), MM 16 (original notes re interview), MM 17–18 (subpoena results including subscriber information only), MM 19 (result of subpoena dated 12-22-2006), MM 20 (administrative subpoena regarding [redacted]). All subjects are redacted under b6-1,-3,-5 / b7C-1,-3,-5. The evidence numbers and case ID confirm this is the physical evidence log for the FBI’s Miami Division Epstein investigation.

The FD-340 evidence logs confirm the FBI issued and received results from multiple administrative subpoenas targeting telecommunications data. Evidence item MM 19 specifically references a subpoena result dated December 22, 2006 — placing active subpoena activity during the height of the pre-plea investigation. Items MM 13 and MM 12 reference CD-ROM toll records — complete call detail records from phone carriers showing who called whom, when, and for how long. These records, which the FBI received and logged as physical evidence, remain sealed under b7D-2 throughout the Part 20 deletion log.

A fax document in Part 20 is addressed to 505 S. Flagler Drive, Suite 500, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 — the FBI’s West Palm Beach field office — and references a legal request received August 22, 2006 instructing the office to begin addressing all legal records to a specific fax number. The document is a corporate confidentiality response, confirming the FBI was using the West Palm Beach office as the central receiving point for all subpoena responses. This is consistent with the MapQuest directions in Part 17 also originating from 505 S. Flagler Drive.

A JetBlue Airways fax dated March 22, 2007, addressed to FBI West Palm Beach (fax 561-833-7970, matching the field office), carries the JetBlue reference number 200-390a. The letter states JetBlue searched its database for all travel information associated with a redacted name on a redacted route and found no responsive records. The request is described as a subpoena. Even a negative result is significant: it documents that the FBI was actively trying to reconstruct the travel patterns of specific individuals in early 2007, nine months before Acosta signed the immunity deal, using multiple airlines as sources.

A Sprint Corporate Security fax dated January 18, 2007, sent from Sprint’s Legal Compliance department (6480 Sprint Parkway, Overland Park, KS) to FBI West Palm Beach (fax 561-833-7970), documents the FBI’s receipt of 13 pages of telecommunications records. The Sprint response carries b6-2 / b7C-2 / b7D-2 redactions. This confirms the FBI was actively subpoenaing phone records from a major national carrier in January 2007 as part of the Epstein investigation. The immunity deal was signed in September 2007. The subpoena activity in January–March 2007 places active federal investigation just months before the investigation was terminated by the plea agreement.

The 341-page deletion log carries b3-1, b6-3,-5, b7C-3,-5, and b7D-1 — the combination of grand jury secrecy, elevated name protection, and express confidential source assurances. The presence of b7D-1 (sources who received an explicit promise of confidentiality) alongside grand jury material confirms that witnesses who testified before the grand jury did so under formal confidentiality agreements — making them doubly protected and their identities doubly sealed. This is the same combination observed in Parts 09 and 10. The consistency confirms a single sustained grand jury proceeding spanning multiple Parts.

A sworn Declaration filed September 17, 2009 by attorney Adam Horowitz (Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM) describes Epstein walking past Jane Doe No. 4 in the courthouse, staring at and intimidating her. Jane Doe No. 4 was terrified, began crying, and ran outside the building. Epstein smirked and walked away. Jane Doe was unable to proceed with her deposition as a result. The declaration was filed in support of a sanctions motion under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 30(d)(2). This document is a sworn legal record confirming Epstein actively used physical intimidation against his own civil plaintiffs inside a federal courthouse in 2009, one year after his 2008 plea deal.

Part 22 contains filings from the consolidated civil cases in which Epstein faced simultaneous civil suits from multiple Jane Does: Cases 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80581, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092 — twelve related cases alongside the primary 08-CV-80119. A filing dated September 11, 2009, references “Defendant Epstein’s Emergence” in a motion context. Court filings address: deposition scheduling, scope of psychological examinations, sanctions for intimidation, and attorney service lists. These cases were the civil accountability mechanism the federal criminal immunity deal foreclosed.

The Part 22 deletion log withholds only 4 pages: Bates 03956-11003956-11026–11027 (duplicate copies of 10983–10984) and 03956-11003956-11028–11029 (also duplicate copies of 10983–10984). No substantive pages are withheld on exemption grounds. This makes Part 22 the only Part in the 22-Part Vault where the withheld material is explained entirely by administrative duplication rather than classified or protected content. Part 22 is functionally a complete release — its court records are accessible, and the 4 held pages add nothing beyond what was already released.

Parts 01–12 total: 5,700 pages. Parts 13–22 total: 3,528 pages. Grand total all 22 Parts: 9,228 pages deleted. Breakdown of new deletions in Parts 13–22 — Part 13: 532 (two sub-files); Part 14: 326; Part 15: 511; Part 16: 515; Part 17: 367; Part 18: 283; Part 19: 475; Part 20: 507; Part 21: 341; Part 22: 4. New exemptions identified in Parts 13–22: b7E (foreign government/intelligence, Parts 14/17/18), b7E-10 (specialized foreign intelligence sub-category, Part 19), b6-8/b7C-8 (FBI administrative personnel, Part 13). All 22 Parts reviewed. Review complete.